?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous entry | Next Entry

Hold your dog!

I recently took a cab ride, and realized that as an advocate, I've missed an important aspect to the cab debates. I've written here before about work I've been a part of (an interview for a news story and observing others who are advocating for equal access). The discussion has always been about getting the dogs and handlers into the cab and to our destination. But one thing that I hadn't looked at, until recently, was the challenge that people with multiple health concerns may have even after convincing the hesitant driver to take them where they want to go.

We always made sure to emphasize the importance of equal access, that it is our right and that the dogs are well groomed, friendly and that they are vital partners in allowing us to function at the highest level possible. I think at some point, it is considered a victory when we are able to have productive dialogues with leaders, and we can see that more people with service and guide dogs are getting into cabs and ultimately where they need to go. But, there's one more issue I'm experiencing. Even if the driver who has religious beliefs about service dogs which do not match my own allows me and Julio into the cab, we still run into the problem of being asked to do things which, because of my RSD, are vary painful and can even cause a flare up, or at least a worsening of symptoms. Consider this recent experience:

Once the driver arrived, he repeatedly asked if my dog was safe. I reassured him, that Julio is well trained, friendly and would not hurt him. Then, when we got in the cab, the driver asked me to hold Julio in a way which caused him to sit on my foot, and when we got out, Julio could not safely back out of the car and I had to lower him to the ground. I didn't realize that Julio could not back up safely until we got out, and I didn't expect the ride to be long, so I didn't say anything. But the driver wasn't familiar with my college, and the ride took a long time. The driver insisted on keeping the windows rolled down, even though it was below 40DG outside. I've since learned that this might be a practice used when someone is riding in a cab and something about them is considered unclean in the Muslim religion.

Since my nervous system doesn't handle cold well, and my RSD causes me severe pain if anything even touches my skin, the combination of Julio on my foot and the wind and cold from the open windows made for a very painful cab ride. And while I want to respect others' religious beliefs, I have a huge quandry. Usually, if I'm taking a cab, it's because I am in enough pain, or have enough distance to travel that riding the bus would not be an option. I need to know that when I take a cab, I won't be in worse pain than I started with.

The reason I worry about this is not just because of my personal pain levels, but also because as I think about it, I wonder about people with other physical health challenges. Not everyone has the strength to consistently and gently lower a 70 pound labrador (who's scared, squirming and doesn't want to get dropped), down to the ground. I wonder if there is some way we can better educate drivers to understand that while we respect their concerns, we can't always meet them because of our disabilities. I also wonder if leaders of various religions could help everyone understand this concept.

I write this not as a criticism, but as a point for further discussion. I applaud the efforts of many who have advocated so that we have better access to the cabs than we did. I would just love to see it taken further.

The experiences I've had have led me to wonder what other difficulties I, as a person who is blind, may not anticipate, but which are normal challenges for someone with a different disability. I also wonder how we as a community of people with disabilities can better support each other as we advocate for our own needs. And finally, I sincerely hope that the relationships which were built by my friends who have worked so tirelessly to advocate foe access to cabs for people with service dogs will allow us to work out ways to make cab rides more pleasant, safe and helpful for both the drivers and the passengers.

Comments

( 3 shots of espresso — Add a shot of espresso )
my_pen
Apr. 26th, 2008 07:00 pm (UTC)
I think it can be done IF the group focusing on change really understands what the issues are within the religious group making the requests. I thought it is as simple as understanding that they consider a dog unclean, but it really isn't that simple. I wish it were. There might be advances made on the thought of use of domestic animals in work environments and what animals are considered 'touchable' and what are not. It also depends largely on how the person themselves interprets it. Some, I know, own dogs. Some have dogs as pets but outside only, some believe it is a religious issue, some believe it's purely a health issue, some are simply offended by dogs as a cultural preference. There are many many different reasons, so the understanding of where they are coming from and why is the first step in understanding what can be done to change the focus from 'dirty animal' to 'work horse'.
the_allie_way
Apr. 27th, 2008 05:37 am (UTC)
Hi Nicky,
I agree with your post. There was one time I had to hold my 70 pound Labrador in my lap during a cab ride, and my only complaint was that it was rainy and muddy outside, so I got all dirty and stuff. You're right, though. How would someone with multiple health concerns have been able to manage in a situation like that?
Thanks for writing about this.

-- Allie
(Anonymous)
Apr. 30th, 2008 10:42 pm (UTC)
ZQiXHthtFBGkA
5ipOKp f8405v845f42mdpc8oa
( 3 shots of espresso — Add a shot of espresso )

Tags

Latest Month

November 2017
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner